MASTERS ON AUDIO AND VIDEOLetters Archives

November  2000

 

Welcome aboard! We too are avid audiophiles and look forward to your contributions which I am sure will be as informative and entertaining as those in the past. Best regards and good luck!!

...Lou Tumolo
President, L A T International, Inc.
Audio-Video cables


I just want to wish you congratulations and best of luck. Over the years I have read, enjoyed and learned much from your articles. If I can do anything to help you, please feel free to contact me.

...Barry Kohan
President, Bright Star Audio


Somebody's gotta kick off the interactive offer on your new site [congratulations by the way] so here's a question for you. In a live acoustic music environment, direct sound reaches the listener only from the stage front. During playback, the listening room characteristics impose their own reflections and artificial ambience that cannot be the same as that of the original venue. Music surround sound pundits claim that the surround speakers can recreate the original ambient cues better than traditional stereo. This is different from bombarding the listener with "main" information from all sides which is obviously artificial since no direct sound reaches a listener from behind in a live environment.

How is the ambient information extracted from two-channel music sources, to be routed to the surround channels in a music surround sound format?

...Srajan Ebaen
SoundStage! columnist and die-hard two-channel dinosaur

In a music context, you're right that the direct sound is almost always up front and that the material coming from other directions constitutes reflections. Very few of the rooms we listen in are large enough to simulate the ambience of a concert hall, so two-channel listening at home is frequently very different from a live experience. It comes closer when the ambience of the larger space is included in the recording and reproduced by its own dedicated speakers. Ideally, this is done intentionally at the mixing stage, but even with recordings not specifically encoded for surround, very realistic effects can be obtained by using a Pro Logic decoder. Much of the ambience is out of phase with the main signal, and it is this out-of-phase material that is fed to the surround channels.

Bombarding the listener with "main" information from all sides, as you put it, is often desirable with movie sound.

...Ian G. Masters


How come my nice new Dolby Digital receiver doesn't give me proper tone controls? My old Pro Logic amp had the greatest tone controls, and a remote to change them with.

...Joe Torbay

Purists have always held that tone controls should not be necessary, and if present should not be used. A certain number of equipment manufacturers have subscribed to this notion over the years and left such controls off their gear. All of that assumes, however, that speakers are linear and rooms don't induce spectral anomalies in the sound, either of which can be helped by a judicious tweaking of tone controls. Multiple speakers do tend to randomize acoustic problems, however, and even very modest speakers come much closer than they once did to flat response, so my guess is the manufacturer of your receiver simply dispensed with a feature it felt was no longer necessary.

...Ian G. Masters


I have read numerous guides on where to put surround speakers and they are still sitting on the floor. My home theater is a fairly big room located in the basement. The couch sits three feet from the rear wall. Could you please point me in the right direction.

...Jack Parker

The positioning is a lot less critical than lots of experts would have you believe. Placing them to the sides of the listening position is usually recommended, especially if they are dipoles, but I've had very good results with the surround speakers behind the listening position, so if you were to mount them on the wall behind your couch, they would probably sound just fine. Placing them high on the wall helps, so I'd get them up off the floor.

...Ian G. Masters


I have a friend who is a serious audiophile who will only use old tube equipment with very efficient speakers. He will only buy used gear. On his recommendation I purchased an integrated amp three years ago that I figure is about ten years old by now. I plan on purchasing a cheap receiver/amp for a second system in my basement. With innovations in technology and circuitry does it make sense to buy ten-year-old equipment, or will new equipment perform equally well?

...Glen Cain

The idea that second-hand equipment is inherently superior to current models is new to me. There's terrible old stuff out there, and wonderful new equipment. . . and vice-versa. A new model will probably be cheaper than an equivalent ten-year-old component was when it was new, but the oldie is likely to be cheaper if you buy it today. It's also likely to be more prone to oxidized connections and noisy controls, but if that doesn't happen in the case of what you buy, you're likely to get as good performance from old equipment as new. But not necessarily better.

...Ian G. Masters


MASTERS ON AUDIO AND VIDEOAll Contents Copyright © 2000
Schneider Publishing Inc., All Rights Reserved
Any reproduction of content on
this site without permission is strictly forbidden.