MASTERS ON AUDIO AND VIDEOTips & Techniques Archives

February 15, 2004

 

In Quest of Reverb,erb,erb

When DSP -- digital signal processing -- first became reasonably common in consumer audio equipment, providing the ambience-enhancement modes in surround receivers and decoders, designers of the more elaborate DSP chips actually measured the reverberant characteristics of real acoustic environments -- concert halls, cathedrals, jazz clubs and the like -- and created algorithms that mimicked them and fed them to the surround-sound speakers.

But lots of recordings, especially live concerts and classical music, already have a lot of ambient material mixed in with the music and, since a lot of that is out of phase, it can be readily extracted by even a first-generation Dolby Pro Logic decoder. Thus it was possible to do a comparison of the artificial ambience created by the DSP circuits and something like the real ambience extracted by Pro Logic.

The phony stuff almost always sounded better. That's not really surprising because, except in the relatively rare instances of music recordings specifically meant for Dolby decoding, the ambient material was uncontrolled, an accidental byproduct of recording in a live venue. Sometimes the decoded product sounded fine, sometimes not, but at least the DSP-produced reverberation usually sounded pretty much as the designers intended.

Extracting fortuitous surround information is especially strange if you're listening to FM. Radio stations process their signals in various ways, and some of the techniques result in wildly exaggerated rear-channel output. Using the DSP modes can be much more natural, but that can sound pretty strange when the music stops and the news begins, sounding like it's being read from a pulpit. It's best to have a quick finger on the remote when listening to radio.

But it still astonishes me that switching such acoustic effects in and out is so simple. I spent a considerable portion of my early audio tinkering trying to achieve something -- anything -- that sounded like reverberation.

At one time it was the preserve of professional audio, which achieved it by means of an "echo chamber." This was a room with very hard and, ideally, non-parallel walls, in which sounds could bounce around for quite a long time. The main program was fed to a speaker in one corner and the resultant prolonged sound picked up by a microphone in a far corner and mixed into the primary signal.

At first, the effect was used mainly in radio dramas to indicate the sound of a cave or a cathedral, or simply to add dramatic effect to announcements.

Record companies picked up on the spaciousness of reverberant sound in the 1950s, and began adding it to virtually every pop recording. It became so familiar that older "dry" recordings began to sound peculiar, and when Jimmy Clanton recorded "Just a Dream" with no reverb in 1958, it sounded very strange indeed, and nobody tried it again.

Almost as odd was the "slap-back" echo used on Elvis Presley's early RCA discs. Instead of a gradually dying reverberation, this consisted of one repeat of the original sound immediately afterwards, and no decay. The effect was like singing in a box.

Once echo chambers gave way to electromechanical reverb devices using spring and metal plates -- still expensive, but not requiring devoting a whole room to the effect -- radio stations took to it with a vengeance. One station that used to come booming in at night in the summer, WABC in New York, put everything through a reverb processor: music, news, traffic reports, everything.

Ultimately, reverb became so overused that at least one radio station I know of banned it entirely. I was involved in making commercials for a hi-fi show at the time, and we had to produce dry versions for that station and reverb-y ones for everyone else.

Long before that, when I was still becoming familiar with tape production techniques, I longed to find some way to simulate reverb. I thought of using a discarded heating-oil tank as an echo chamber, but my parents weren't keen on having it in the house. So I turned to the electronics magazines, and attempted some of their projects.

The first involved gluing the end of a long, coiled door spring to half a ping-pong ball and gluing that to the center of a speaker, which reproduced the original signal. The other end was straightened out and the metal inserted into an old-style phono cartridge designed to use steel needles. The sound playing through the speaker would travel back and forth along the spring, being picked up by the cartridge. The result was a decidedly boingy effect, and if anything bumped the table this contraption was on, it made the sort of noise you'd expect from tossing a grand piano out a third-floor window.

My next attempt involved, as I recall, a length of garden hose, and sounded like it. I finally was able to get something plausible when I bought my Revox A77 open-reel tape recorder, whose three heads let you create reverb by tape delay, which is how many pros did it by then. But the machine made you go through the hoops to get the effect; it's the one thing I always had to go back to the owner's manual to do. The notion of simply pushing a button on a receiver to do the same would have been preposterous.

That's just one more thing that digital does better.

...Ian G. Masters
ian@mastersonaudio.com


MASTERS ON AUDIO AND VIDEOAll Contents Copyright © 2004
Schneider Publishing Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Any reproduction of content on
this site without permission is strictly forbidden.