MASTERS ON AUDIO AND VIDEOVideo Archives

October 15, 2003

 

Video This and That

Some more queries from readers about various aspects of today's video scene:

I have a 40" direct-view TV and hope someday to buy an HDTV direct-view set or some kind of widescreen flat display. But I don't want to give up the height that I'm used to. What screen size do I need to look for in a widescreen HDTV set so that it can have the same height as my present screen?

Screen sizes for widescreen televisions, with an aspect ratio of 16:9, are measured in exactly the same way as for conventional 4:3 sets, diagonally from one corner of the viewable area to the other. But because of the different shape, a widescreen set will be considerably shallower and somewhat narrower than a 4:3 set with the same numerical rating.

I won't bore you with the arithmetic, but there are some simple numbers you can use to compare sizes.

In my view, the greatest impression of size is the screen's height: Letterboxed images on even large normal sets tend to look dinky. To find out what the height of a widescreen set would translate into in ordinary terms, multiply by approximately 80%. A 27" widescreen model would have a picture only as deep as a 22" standard set.

Put another way, to get a widescreen as deep as that of a 27" 4:3 set, you'd need one with a diagonal measurement of about 33" (multiply by 1.22). In the case of your 40" requirement, you will need a widescreen measuring 49 or 50 inches.

The image size of a 27" widescreen is about the same as a letterboxed image on a 30" normal screen, assuming the same 16:9 aspect ratio.

I am considering the purchase of a digital satellite system. The product info indicates that I need an "unobstructed view to the south." I live in an area with quite a few trees. I would mount the dish on the rooftop but there would still be some foliage in the way. How critical is the unobstructed view to the image quality?

A little foliage may not be a problem; buildings and mountains are another matter. The dish only needs a small window to see through, so it's usually possible to position it so the signal is unobstructed. Also, the farther south you are, the higher the dish has to be aimed so it may well be that the angle plus the height of your roof is enough to clear the treetops.

Obstructions, incidentally, are more likely to interrupt the picture than degrade its quality. The same is true of things like heavy rain.

I have read that connecting a video source to a TV via an RF cable would yield a maximum horizontal resolution of 330 lines, even if the source is a DVD or satellite receiver, and that the sound would be mono even if both the set and the source are capable of stereo. If that were the case, why would manufacturers make machines with only RF inputs and outputs?

You're correct on both technical counts, in my experience. The resolution is equivalent to a good off-air signal, and is about the maximum most TV tuners can handle. As for stereo, it would involve considerably more complex circuitry in a disc player, and I imagine that manufacturers assume that anybody interested in taking advantage of the higher performance available wouldn't be using RF connections anyway. In fact, except perhaps for the very lowest models, it's very unlikely that any manufacturer of VCRs -- or any video component -- would provide only RF outputs today.

When a widescreen-format DVD is being played with a black area above and below, are there still 480 (but thinner) lines in the viewing area, or is the picture now being displayed with fewer horizontal lines?

When you watch a widescreen movie on a conventional NTSC television set, only those scanning lines in the middle of the screen are visible; the others are still there, but receiving no signal. Thus, a widescreen image has significantly lower vertical resolution than the equivalent full-screen image. This can be quite drastic. If the movie was shot in Panavision -- the most common widescreen technique for theaters -- only about half the scanning lines are used. None of this is true, of course, with high-definition digital signals.

...Ian G. Masters
ian@mastersonaudio.com


MASTERS ON AUDIO AND VIDEOAll Contents Copyright © 2003
Schneider Publishing Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Any reproduction of content on
this site without permission is strictly forbidden.